GINSBERG v. FUSARO

(14471)

225 Conn. 420 (1993)

MARTIN GINSBERG ET AL. v. JOHN FUSARO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 27, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Ryan III, with whom, on the brief, was Laureen J. Vitale, for the appellant-appellee (named plaintiff).

Edward V. O`Hanlan, with whom, on the brief, was James A. Wade, for the appellee-appellant (defendant Rita Fusaro).

PETERS, C. J., BORDEN, BERDON, NORCOTT and F. X. HENNESSY, JS.


BERDON, J.

These appeals arise out of an action brought by the plaintiff dentists, Martin Ginsberg and Robert Miller, seeking to recover from the defendant Rita Fusaro1 the reasonable value of dental services rendered to her. Although the case started as a collection case, it developed into a dental malpractice case when Fusaro filed a counterclaim alleging that Ginsberg and Miller had been negligent in performing the dental services....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases