The trial court appropriately exercised its discretion in permitting cross-examination of defendant only as to those prior convictions that were not remote in time, and that had a reasonable bearing on credibility (People v Sandoval,
Defendant failed to object to the two isolated comments of the prosecutor made during cross-examination and summation that he now claims constituted error, and thus failed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.