1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 268 N.J.
  5. 268 N.J. Super. 370 (1993)
 

FORENZA v. RODGERS

268 N.J. Super. 370 (1993)

633 A.2d 1001

PATRICK J. FORENZA AND THOMAS RIZZI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK E. RODGERS, CLERK OF HUDSON COUNTY, ANTHONY RAFFAELE, WILLIAM STOECKER AND THE HUDSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 19, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil D. Marotta argued the cause for appellants (Libero D. Marotta, attorney).

Marta Baez Petrocelli argued the cause for respondent Frank E. Rodgers (Francis De Leonardis, Hudson County Counsel, attorney; Mark E. Morchel, Deputy County Counsel, on the brief).

Scarinci & Hollenbeck, attorneys for respondent Hudson County Democratic Committee, relied on the brief filed by Hudson County Counsel.

Respondents Anthony Raffaele and William Stoecker did not file a brief.

Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and BROCHIN.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge D'Italia in his written opinion reported at 268 N.J.Super. 482, 633 A.2d 1057

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases