ROESCH v. STATE

No. 79937.

633 So.2d 1 (1993)

James Allen ROESCH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce Rogow of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., and Beverly Pohl, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, amicus curiae for Florida Public Defenders Ass'n.

Leonard W. Yanke, pro se, amicus curiae.


GRIMES, Justice.

We review Roesch v. State, 596 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE METHOD OF DISCLOSURE OF PUBLIC RECORDS HELD BY THE STATE ATTORNEY OR CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE RECORDS ARE REQUESTED BY AN UNREPRESENTED PRISONER WHO SEEKS THE RECORDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases