1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 310 S.C.
  5. 310 S.C. 323 (1993)
 

BANCOHIO NATIONAL BANK v. NEVILLE

23793

310 S.C. 323 (1993)

426 S.E.2d 773

BANCOHIO NATIONAL BANK, Respondent v. John L. NEVILLE, Sr., individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of McCurry B. Neville, deceased, Rieppe N. Mays and Annette N. Clark, Petitioners, and Frank E. Martin, Lynn V. Martin, Elizabeth D. Darby, David B. Durham, Geraldine R. Durham, Michael A. Miller, Ann S. Miller, Faye S. League, Hayne L. Simmons, Eva C. Simmons, Marshall G. Smith, Sharon A. Smith, Gerald J. Cappelen, Constance L. Cappelen, Kenneth H. Poston, Cynthia J. Poston, George J. Stock, Jr., Charlotte Stock, John H. Robert, Charlene Robert, Randall R. Reigers, Elizabeth G. Reigers, Odes E. Roberts, Pamela K. Roberts, William C. Tucker, Dorothy Tucker, Herbert P. Mahoney, Jerry Herbert Mahoney, of whom Frank E. Martin, Lynn V. Martin, Elizabeth D. Darby, David B. Durham, Geraldine R. Durham, Michael A. Miller, Ann S. Miller, Faye S. League, Hayne L. Simmons, Eva C. Simmons, Marshall G. Smith, Sharon A. Smith, Gerald J. Cappelen, Constance L. Cappelen, Kenneth H. Poston, Cynthia J. Poston, George J. Stock, Jr., Charlotte Stock, John H. Robert, Charlene Robert, are, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided February 1, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry C. Brandt and W.J. Fedder, both of Brandt & Fedder, Walhalla, for petitioners.

Julian L. Stoudemire and Lowell W. Ross, both of Ross, Stoudemire and Awde, Seneca, for respondent.

Theodore A. Snyder, Jr., Walhalla, for respondents Martin, Darby, Durham, Miller, League, Simmons, Smith, Cappelen, Poston, Stock and Robert.

Timothy C. Merrell, Seneca, for Reigers.

Robert K. Whitney, Seneca, for Mahoneys.

William C. Tucker, pro se.

Dorothy C. Tucker, pro se.

Odes E. Roberts, pro se.

Pamela K. Roberts pro se.

Heard Oct. 14, 1992.

Decided Feb. 1, 1993.

TOAL, Justice:

This case comes before the Court on a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review a decision affirming the Master-in-Equity's closing of a public road, and to review the Court of Appeals' interpretation of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. We REVERSE.

Facts

An action was filed in Oconee County to close and abandon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases