HUME v. ROYAL

No. 92-1188.

619 So.2d 12 (1993)

George W. HUME and Jill D. Hume, His Wife, Appellants, v. James J. ROYAL and Carole E. Royal, His Wife, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied June 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John McE. Miller of Bartlett & Miller, Ponte Vedra Beach, for appellants.

Katherine G. Jones of Upchurch, Bailey and Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, for appellees.


COBB, Judge.

The appellants, George and Jill Hume, appeal a final judgment in which the trial court found that the construction of a dock by the appellees, James and Carole Royal, was not contrary to the intended purpose of their easement grant.

James Royal testified at trial that in 1979 he purchased the eastern portion of property then owned by Annie Parado, the Humes' predecessor in title. Because the bank required him to obtain an easement to a canal before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases