1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 199 A.D.2d
  5. 199 A.D.2d 429 (1993)
 

PEOPLE v. RAVENTOS

199 A.D.2d 429 (1993)

605 N.Y.S.2d 334

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Raventos, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 20, 1993

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In People v Bialostok (80 N.Y.2d 738), the Court of Appeals held that, irrespective of how it is actually used, an electronic device which can in some way be adapted so as to function as an eavesdropping device must be deemed an eavesdropping device for the purpose of applying the controlling statutory and constitutional provisions (US Const 4th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases