1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 622 So.2d
  5. 622 So.2d 1 (1993)
 

ZUCKERMAN v. HOFRICHTER & QUIAT, P.A.

No. 92-2532.

622 So.2d 1 (1993)

Donald S. ZUCKERMAN, etc., et al., Appellants, v. HOFRICHTER & QUIAT, P.A., etc., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Proenza, White, Huck & Roberts, P.A., and Paul C. Huck, Miami, for appellants.

Wolpe, Leibowitz, Berger & Brotman and Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER REQUIRING SUPERSEDEAS BOND

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(f), Donald S. Zuckerman moves for review of an order setting the amount of the supersedeas bond to be posted in order to stay the trial court's order pending appeal. We grant the motion.

Appellee Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., holds an unsatisfied judgment against Zuckerman. Hofrichter & Quiat served a writ of garnishment on Provident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases