BRENNER v. BERKOWITZ


134 N.J. 488 (1993)

634 A.2d 1019

JUDITH R. BRENNER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HOWARD BERKOWITZ, RUTH BERKOWITZ, AND ARBEE ASSOCIATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan L. Goldstein argued the cause for appellants (Hellring, Lindeman, Goldstein & Siegal, attorneys; Mr. Goldstein and Richard K. Coplon, of counsel and on the briefs).

Martin J. Brenner argued the cause for respondent (Brenner & Falkin, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of two provisions of N.J.S.A. 14A:12-7. Specifically, we address the rights and remedies of a minority shareholder in a close corporation who claims fraud, illegality, mismanagement, and oppression by the majority shareholders in violation of N.J.S.A. 14A:12-7(1)(c), and the requirements for a court-ordered buy-out...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases