1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 265 N.J.
  5. 265 N.J. Super. 351 (1993)
 

STATE v. ACKER

265 N.J. Super. 351 (1993)

627 A.2d 170

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORMAN ACKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. De Marco, attorney for appellant.

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Nancy A. Hulett, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, SHEBELL and CONLEY.

PER CURIAM.

The key issue raised in this appeal is whether the prosecutor's summation was so egregious as to require a new trial. We hold that it was.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury on two counts of second-degree sexual assault upon two females who were less than 13 years old, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2b, (Counts One and Three); and two counts of fourth-degree endangering the welfare of the same two children, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:24...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases