1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 192 A.D.2d
  5. 192 A.D.2d 424 (1993)
 

GRISTEDE v. MORRIS & McVEIGH

192 A.D.2d 424 (1993)

597 N.Y.S.2d 6

Amy B. Gristede, Appellant, v. Morris & McVeigh et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 22, 1993

There is no merit to plaintiff's argument that the Statute of Limitations was tolled because of defendants' continuous representation. Leaving aside the question of standing arising from whether defendants represented plaintiff or a decedent whose estate is not a party, more must be pleaded than occasional, general representation (see, Olkowski v City of New York, 179 A.D.2d 570...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases