PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at
WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ., dissenting.
We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell's dissenting opinion, reported at
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.