1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 66 Ohio
  5. 66 Ohio St.3d 539 (1993)
 

ALUMINIUM LINE PRODS. CO. v. ROLLS-ROYCE MOTORS, INC.

No. 92-1093.

66 Ohio St.3d 539 (1993)

ALUMINUM LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. ROLLS-ROYCE MOTORS, INC, ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci & Lancione, Peter H. Weinberger and Dennis R. Lansdowne, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Hahn, Loeser & Parks, David C. Weiner and R. Steven DeGeorge, for appellees and cross-appellants.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

Aluminum Line's appeal raises one issue for our determination. As the purchaser of an allegedly defective vehicle, Aluminum Line urges us to hold that a plea for rescission is essentially equivalent to a request to revoke acceptance.

Aluminum Line's original complaint was filed April 4, 1986 ("1986 complaint"). Paragraph eight of the complaint states: "Plaintiff hereby seeks to recind [sic] the contract for the purchase of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases