SEAMON v. APEL


191 A.D.2d 406 (1993)

595 N.Y.S.2d 202

Mila Seamon et al., Respondents, v. Bernard Apel et al., Defendants, and Mohamed Abbas, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 30, 1993


The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in striking appellant's answer for failure to comply with two prior orders directing him to appear for deposition. "When a discovery order is disobeyed, the court, in its discretion, may strike relevant pleadings" (Besson v Beirne, 188 A.D.2d 330, 331). "The fact that defendant has disappeared or made himself unavailable provides no basis for denying a motion to strike his answer, particularly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases