MINTER v. PIERCE TRANSIT

No. 14331-3-II.

68 Wn. App. 528 (1993)

843 P.2d 1128

HELEN M. MINTER, Respondent, v. PIERCE TRANSIT, Petitioner.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

January 25, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce L. Schroeder and Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, for petitioner.

James F. Imperiale and Griffin Imperiale Bobman & Verhey, P.S., for respondent.


PETRICH, J.

In this wrongful termination of employment suit initiated by Helen M. Minter against Pierce Transit,1 her employer, Pierce Transit sought and this court accepted discretionary review of the trial court's denial of Pierce Transit's motion for summary judgment of dismissal. Pierce Transit contends that the arbitration procedure provided for in the collective bargaining agreement covering Minter's employment was the sole and exclusive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases