INTERPOOL LTD. v. PERDI INS. BROKERS, INC.


191 A.D.2d 405 (1993)

595 N.Y.S.2d 687

Interpool Limited, Respondent, v. Perdi Insurance Brokers, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 30, 1993


There is no merit to defendant's argument that the court improperly decided, as a matter of law, that defendant was not owed a refund of money advanced conditionally to plaintiff. The agreement is not ambiguous with respect to the one condition under which plaintiff had agreed to return the money. It was defendant's burden to prove that the condition had occurred (see, Lindenbaum v Royco Prop. Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases