CITY OF CINCINNATI v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

No. 92-2101.

67 Ohio St.3d 523 (1993)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fay D. Dupuis, City Solicitor, and Richard Ganulin, Assistant City Solicitor, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, James B. Gainer, Duane W. Luckey, William L. Wright and Jeffrey D. Van Niel, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Alan P. Buchmann, Arthur E. Korkosz and Lisa R. Battaglia; James J. Mayer and Michael A. Gribler, for intervening appellee CG&E.


Per Curiam.

The city argues that the commission erred: (1) in determining Zimmer's reasonable original cost, including failing to make a prudence adjustment to CG&E's Zimmer rate base; and (2) in using a twelve-month average stock price to estimate CG&E's cost of common equity. For the reasons which follow, we reject these arguments and affirm the commission's order.

I. REASONABLE ORIGINAL COST

A. Equivalent Plant Standard

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases