MEANEY v. SACRAMENTO HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Docket No. A056917.

13 Cal.App.4th 566 (1993)

16 Cal. Rptr.2d 589

DAVE MEANEY, as Superintendent, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brinley & Schott, Leonard D. Brinley, John W. Short and Steven M. Schott for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Brenton A. Bleier and Alan C. Campbell for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

NEWSOM, J.

Four school districts in the Sacramento area, joined by the Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools (hereafter referred to collectively as School Districts), appeal an order dismissing their first amended petition for writ of mandate and complaint for a validating proceeding against the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (hereafter the Agency), the City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases