Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, we agree with the Family Court that the complainant's testimony that he experienced persistent headaches and dizziness after being struck by respondent was sufficient to show substantial pain within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) and § 120.00 (1) (see, People v Bailey,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.