The action was properly dismissed because plaintiffs' sworn proof of loss statement contained the material misrepresentations that they owned the insured property at the time of the loss, that no other person had any interest in or encumbrances on the property, and that there had been no change of interest in the property since issuance of the policy of insurance. Documentary evidence conclusively establishes that when plaintiffs presented the proof of loss statement, they...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
