1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 5 F.3d
  5. 5 F.3d 558 (1993)
 

U.S. v. PRANDY-BINETT

No. 91-3296.

5 F.3d 558 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pedro Jolio PRANDY-BINETT, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

October 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, filed a Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc on behalf of defendant-appellee.

J. Ramsey Johnson, U.S. Atty., John R. Fisher and M. Evan Corcoran, Asst. U.S. Attys., filed an Opposition to Appellee's Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc on behalf of plaintiff-appellant.

Before: EDWARDS, D.H. GINSBURG, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ON APPELLEE'S PETITION FOR REHEARING

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge, with whom D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge, concurs:

The petition for rehearing charges that our opinion "effectively eviscerates the Fourth Amendment" because it "conjures up a theory of `conditional probabilities'." "Eviscerate," "conjure" — these are strong words. When they are deployed, their author had better supply some strong reasoning to back them up. Nothing of the sort appears in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases