PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. v. COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 91-1043.

508 U.S. 49 (1993)

PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC., ET AL. v. COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.

United States Supreme Court.

Decided May 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Coyne argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was James R. Loftis III.

Andrew J. Pincus argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Richard J. Favretto, Roy T. Englert, Jr., and Stephen A. Kroft.*

Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Blackmun, Scalia, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ., joined. Souter, J., filed a concurring opinion, p. 66. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which O'Connor, J.,joined, p. 67.


Justice Thomas, delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case requires us to define the "sham" exception to the doctrine of antitrust immunity first identified in Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961), as that doctrine applies in the litigation context. Under the sham exception, activity "ostensibly directed toward influencing governmental action" does not qualify for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases