Initially consenting to introduction of evidence that he was apprehended in possession of a shopping bag containing items that still contained store tags, defendant argued in his opening statement that he entered the building only to peddle goods. His subsequent change of mind at trial concerning the admissibility of this evidence came after the People had already developed a strategy to rebut defendant's claim, when the court could no longer effectively change its ruling...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.