1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 498 N.W.2d
  5. 498 N.W.2d 58 (1993)
 

COUNTY OF ANOKA v. ESMAILZADEH

No. C9-92-1668.

498 N.W.2d 58 (1993)

COUNTY OF ANOKA, State of Minnesota, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Karim ESMAILZADEH, et al., Lower Court Respondents, and Finaserve, Inc., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Johnson, Anoka County Atty., Daniel A. Klint, Asst. Anoka County Atty., Anoka, Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Lloyd J. Moosbrugger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gordon L. Moore, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondents.

John F. Bannigan, Jr., James J. Hanton, Bannigan & Kelly, P.A., St. Paul, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and LANSING and HARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

In this eminent domain proceeding, appellant Finaserve, Inc. challenges a trial court judgment that Finaserve is not entitled to compensation from respondent County of Anoka for loss of access caused by a construction project at the intersection of two roadways abutting Finaserve's property on the north and east. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On November 7, 1988, Anoka initiated this action pursuant to Minn.Stat. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases