Despite defendant's failure to respond to plaintiff's May 10, 1991 letter requesting a schedule of depositions of all parties at an early date, on the record before us its conduct was not so egregious as to warrant the IAS Court's action in denying defendant any opportunity to depose or physically examine plaintiff. That defendant conducted its pre-action physical examination of plaintiff, to which it was entitled by statute, shortly after the complaint was served does not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
