1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 268 N.J.
  5. 268 N.J. Super. 279 (1993)
 

VOGES v. BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS

268 N.J. Super. 279 (1993)

633 A.2d 566

GERD VOGES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, ANTHONY MUSCILLO, BOROUGH ADMINISTRATOR, BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, LOUIS RAUPP, CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL, BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Massaro argued the cause for appellant.

Sharon Handrock Moore argued the cause for respondents (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys; Ms. Moore, on the brief).

Before Judges LONG and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Gerd Voges appeals from a judgement which dismissed his complaint in lieu of prerogative writs following a bench trial in the Law Division. Voges, employed as the Tinton Falls Plumbing Subcode Official, sought damages arising from allegedly improper reduction of his hours and salary to part-time status, and asserted civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Borough of Tinton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases