WAMSLEY v. CHAMPLIN REFINING AND CHEMICALS, INC.

No. 92-1743.

11 F.3d 534 (1993)

Allen M. WAMSLEY, Donald J. Whittenberg, Anthony J. Nagy, Betty R. Sanderson and Glenda K. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPLIN REFINING AND CHEMICALS, INC., et al., Defendants, Champlin Refining and Chemicals, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 30, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Edward Goodman, Jr., Fults, Francis & Goodman, Dallas, TX, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Susan L.P. Starr, EEOC, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae EEOC.

Stanley Weiner, Janet A. Hendrick, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Dallas, TX, for Champlin, Citgo and Termination Pay Plan.

Ann Elizabeth Reesman, McGuiness & Williams, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae EEAC.

James Baird, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, for amicus curiae NPELRA.

Before JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges, and BARBOUR, District Judge.


DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

We are called upon in this case to determine whether the waiver requirements of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act2 (the "OWBPA"), make our holding in Grillet v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 927 F.2d 217 (5th Cir.1991), unsound. Because we conclude that nothing in the text or the legislative history of the OWBPA evidences a congressional intent to disturb the common law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases