DAVIS v. REED


191 A.D.2d 348 (1993)

596 N.Y.S.2d 4

Sara Davis, Appellant, v. Bradford Reed et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 23, 1993


The claim that plaintiff was unable to remember the August 1988 incident underlying the action until late in 1990 implicitly concedes defendant College's point that an issue of fact exists as to the date on which plaintiff's causes of action against the College accrued. The conclusory assertion of repressed memory due to "posttraumatic neurosis" is insufficient to invoke the tolling provisions of CPLR 208 (Hoffman v Hoffman, 162 A.D.2d 249

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases