LYNCH v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY

No. C8-92-1631.

498 N.W.2d 37 (1993)

Richard Paul LYNCH, Petitioner, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Nichols, Curtis D. Brown, Nichols, Kaster & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Ronald S. Latz, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and LANSING and HARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Richard Paul Lynch argues that his refusal of a blood test because of his objection to a routine hospital consent form, followed by his rejection of an alternative urine test, does not constitute refusal to submit to testing for implied consent purposes. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 26, 1992, Lynch was arrested for driving while under the influence. The arresting law enforcement officer transported Lynch...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases