HECHT v. LEVIN

No. 92-286.

66 Ohio St.3d 458 (1993)

HECHT, APPELLEE, v. LEVIN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Kleinman, for appellee.

Morris Levin Co., L.P.A., Morris Levin and Daniel J. Levin; Levin & Levin and James A. Levin; Paris & Paris and Thomas A. Paris, for appellant.

Albert L. Bell; Arter & Hadden and Geoffrey Stern, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio State Bar Association.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Loren L. Braverman, Assistant Attorney General, urging reversal for amici curiae, Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio and Office of Disciplinary Counsel.


MOYER, C.J.

We are asked to decide what privilege attaches to statements made in a grievance filed with a certified grievance committee of a local bar association. For the reasons stated below, we hold that it is an absolute privilege.

As an initial matter, we address Levin's argument that Hecht cannot maintain a defamation action because the filing of a grievance, which is confidential, is not a publication. The publication of defamatory matter is an essential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases