DRAGUTSKY v. TATE


262 N.J. Super. 257 (1993)

620 A.2d 1065

LEONARD E. DRAGUTSKY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HERBERT H. TATE, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 19, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Venturi and Schlich, attorneys for appellant (Shaun R. Schlich on the letter brief).

Stephen J. Edelstein, Essex County Counsel, attorney for respondent (Charles Rawitz, Assistant County Counsel, on the letter brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, R.S. COHEN and MUIR, Jr.


The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S. COHEN, J.A.D.

This is a civil action against the Essex County Prosecutor seeking the return of $6,485.76 seized from plaintiff when he was arrested in 1987. The action was dismissed as untimely. We reverse.

Plaintiff and a friend were arrested in a car in Bloomfield. The friend was driving and plaintiff was the passenger. We cannot tell from the fragmentary record what led to the arrest. All we know is that plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases