The undercover's uncontroverted testimony established that the officer readily identified defendant three days after defendant had sold heroin to the officer. The jury's determination that the undercover's identification testimony was credible should be accorded great weight and any minor inconsistencies in the testimony were for the jury to reconcile (see, People v Cox,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.