McNABOLA v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

No. 92-1133.

10 F.3d 501 (1993)

William McNABOLA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 24, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda Friedman (argued), Richard C. Leng, Leng, Stowell, Friedman & Vernon, Nicholas J. Motherway, Mark E. McNabola, Motherway & Glenn, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Mitchell Ware (argued), Dianne McCollough, Jones, Ware & Grenard, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellant.

Before RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.


ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

William McNabola maintains that the Chicago Transit Authority (the "CTA") discriminated against him on account of his race when it terminated his relationship with the CTA. The jury found that the CTA's Board of Directors had a custom or policy of terminating whites similarly situated to McNabola and that McNabola had been terminated pursuant to that custom or policy. The jury accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases