1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 261 N.J.
  5. 261 N.J. Super. 245 (1993)
 

CARTER LINCOLN-MERCURY v. EMAR

261 N.J. Super. 245 (1993)

618 A.2d 870

CARTER LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., LEASING DIVISION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EMAR GROUP, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ALL POINTS, INC., A/K/A GOLDSTAR EXPRESS AND ELLIOTT H. GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 6, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Wright argued the cause for appellant (Farr, Lyons, Burke Gambacorta & Wright, attorneys; Mr. Wright, on the brief).

David B. Katz argued the cause for respondent (Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Jeffrey M. Garrod and Mr. Katz, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges BILDER, BAIME and WALLACE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by the owner-lessor of a motor vehicle from an order of the Law Division granting an insurance broker a summary judgment dismissing the owner's complaint for losses suffered because of the failure of the broker to furnish the lessee with an insurance policy adequate to furnish appropriate indemnity to the owner as loss payee when the vehicle suffered collision damage. We are confronted with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases