The thrust of the administrative determination of this multiple tenants' application for decrease in rent was that petitioner-landlord had deprived its tenants of a "required" service, namely, their individual roof-top television antennas, for which they had purportedly been paying an increased rent. (Initially, the agency had erroneously taken the position that petitioner had removed a television master antenna from the roof.) The reduction of this purported building-wide...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
