Contrary to defendant's argument, the evidence before the jury that defendant led the undercover officer to the apartment in question, invited her inside, obtained drugs from that apartment which were packaged in accordance with the undercover officer's response to the co-indictee's inquiry and then sold a quantity of drugs to the undercover officer, sufficiently connected defendant to the drug stash located inside that apartment to support the jury's determination that defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.