1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 438 S.E.2d
  5. 438 S.E.2d 59 (1993)
 

MARCUM TRUCKING v. U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR.

No. 21566.

438 S.E.2d 59 (1993)

190 W.Va. 267

MARCUM TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., a Corporation; Stollings Trucking Company, Inc., a Corporation; Willis Marcum; M & D Mining Company, Inc., a Corporation; and Frank Frye, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY and GUARANTY COMPANY, a Corporation; Everett Meddings; Vicie Meddings; Troy Browning, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Joan Ella Browning; Louise M. Crum, Administratrix of the Estate of Delmas Ronald Crum; Sandra F. Pertee; Elaine Messer; Myrtle Alley; Betty R. Osborne and Michelle Osborne, Defendants Below, Everett Meddings; Vicie Meddings; Troy Browning, Jr., As Administrator of the Estate of Joan Ella Browning; Louise M. Crum, Administratrix of the Estate of Delmas Ronald Crum; Sandra F. Pertee; Elaine Messer; Myrtle Alley; Betty R. Osborne and Michelle Osborne, Appellees, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Decided November 23, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. McQueen, Jr., Deborah E. Greenham, McQueen & Brown, L.C., Charleston, for appellant.

Robert B. King, John J. Polak, King, Betts & Allen, Charleston, for appellee, Louise M. Crum.

Menis E. Ketchum, Greene, Ketchum, Bailey & Tweel, Huntington, for appellees, Sandra F. Pertee, Elaine Messer and Myrtle Alley.

J. Brooks Lawson, Jr., Lawson & Lawson, Williamson, for appellee, Troy Browning, Jr.

Lawrence J. Lewis, Huntington, for appellees, Marcum Trucking Co., Inc., Stollings Trucking Co., Inc., Willis Marcum, M & D Mining and Frank Frye.

PER CURIAM:

The defendant/appellant, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G), appeals from an August 28,1992, order of the Circuit Court of Wayne County, which granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs, Marcum Trucking Co., Inc., Stollings Trucking Co., Inc., Willis Marcum, M & D Mining Co., Inc., and Frank Frye. As a result of having the summary judgment order entered against them, USF & G is required to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases