ROGERS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.

Docket No. B073586.

19 Cal.App.4th 469 (1993)

23 Cal. Rptr.2d 412

WILLIAM ROGERS, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; CITY OF BURBANK et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Darlene M. Ricker and Barbara S. Blinderman for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney, Freilich, Kaufman, Fox & Sohagi, Benjamin Kaufman and Deborah J. Fox for Real Parties in Interest.


OPINION

GRIGNON, Acting P.J.

Petitioner William Rogers seeks review of an order of respondent court denying his request for disclosure of public records from real party in interest, the City of Burbank (the City),1 pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.,2 hereinafter the Act). He contends: (1) respondent court erred in finding that telephone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases