1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 121 Wn.2d
  5. 121 Wn.2d 366 (1993)
 

SCHAEFCO v. GORGE COMMISSION

No. 59876-2.

121 Wn.2d 366 (1993)

849 P.2d 1225

SCHAEFCO, INC., ET AL, Appellants, v. COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blair, Schaefer, Hutchison & Wolfe, by Michael Simon, for appellants.

Lawrence Watters, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

Appellants, Schaefco, Inc. and Wynco, Inc. (Schaefco), wish to develop property which is subject to the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 544 (Gorge Act). Their proposal to develop one lot in an intended larger development was rejected by the Columbia River Gorge Commission (Commission). The Commission was affirmed on appeal by the Clark County Superior Court. Because Schaefco has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases