The petitioner was randomly selected to provide a urine sample for drug testing. He tested positive, but testified he unknowingly and innocently ingested tainted medication and suggested a superior officer tainted his medication. Petitioner now urges that he established an affirmative defense to the charge, but we find no reason to disturb the credibility findings of the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Harmon v New York City Police Dept.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.