Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 16, 1991, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the resettled order dated August 26, 1991; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated August 26, 1991, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
We find that the court did not err in deciding that it would be in the best interest of the child (see, Eschbach v Eschbach,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.