OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BALL

No. 93-388.

67 Ohio St.3d 401 (1993)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BALL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Dianna L. Chesley, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.


MOYER, C.J.

DR 6-101(A)(3) states that "A lawyer shall not * * * neglect a legal matter entrusted to him." This court has previously interpreted this rule to warrant sanction when an attorney neglects to file necessary legal papers for clients and answer clients' inquiries, fails to prosecute actions on a client's behalf, and mismanages probate proceedings and guardianships. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Ebel (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 145

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases