1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 9 F.3d
  5. 9 F.3d 455 (1993)
 

DOE v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TULLAHOMA CITY SCHOOLS

No. 92-5996.

9 F.3d 455 (1993)

John DOE, a minor, By and Through his next friends and parents James and Mary DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOARD of EDUCATION of TULLAHOMA CITY SCHOOLS; Charles Embry, Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 5, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shane Usary (argued and briefed), Luther, Anderson, Cleary, Ruth & Speed, Tricia Dennis (argued and briefed), Alley & Dennis, Chattanooga, TN, for plaintiff-appellant.

Frank Van Cleave (briefed), Ray & Van Cleave, Tullahoma, TN, John D. Kitch (argued and briefed), Kitch, Deas & Klein, Nashville, TN, for defendants-appellees.

Before: KEITH, GUY, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Doe, a minor, appeals the district court's judgment upholding an Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) ruling that his parents are not entitled to reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA or "Act"), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1485, for tuition expenses incurred from his enrollment at a private school. We AFFIRM the district court's decision denying John Doe's parents reimbursement.

I.

Appellant was enrolled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases