BIDNA v. ROSEN

Docket No. G012357.

19 Cal.App.4th 27 (1993)

23 Cal. Rptr.2d 251

HOWARD M. BIDNA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NANCI ANN ROSEN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

September 30, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bidna & Keys, Richard D. Keys, Harvey M. Moore and Jon A. Longerbone for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Randolph B. Godshall, Weinfeld & Mixon, Cameron Jolly, Ezra and Brutzkus and Robert Ezra for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

I

The trajectory of the case law now governing malicious prosecution claims arising out of family law proceedings arcs toward one destination: a bright line barring any such claims, no matter how egregious the defendant's conduct in the family law action. The present case (at least as pled) is egregious indeed, and forces us to ponder whether the arc should be completed.

After the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases