DENBURG v. PARKER CHAPIN


82 N.Y.2d 375 (1993)

624 N.E.2d 995

604 N.Y.S.2d 900

Howard S. Denburg, Respondent, v. Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 18, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, New York City (Alvin M. Stein, Mark Abramowitz and Amos Alter of counsel), appellant pro se.

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City (Sheldon Raab, Honey L. Kober and Dino Fusco of counsel), for respondent.

Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., SMITH and LEVINE concur with Chief Judge KAYE; Judge BELLACOSA dissents in a separate opinion.


Chief Judge KAYE.

In this dispute between a law firm and a former partner, we agree with the Appellate Division that a provision in the partnership agreement requiring certain payments upon a partner's withdrawal is unenforceable under Cohen v Lord, Day & Lord (75 N.Y.2d 95). Nevertheless, we conclude that the Appellate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases