1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 20 Cal.App.4th
  5. 20 Cal.App.4th 431 (1993)
 

PEOPLE v. SCHINDLER

Docket No. B077198.

20 Cal.App.4th 431 (1993)

26 Cal. Rptr.2d 255

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARYN SCHINDLER, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

November 23, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Caryn Schindler, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Debbie Lew and Edith Kornfeld Light, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

VOGEL (C.S.), Acting P.J.

Pursuant to rule 62, California Rules of Court, we transferred this matter from the appellate department of the superior court in order to settle an important question of law. (1) Contrary to the appellate department, we conclude that after convicting a defendant of a traffic infraction the trial court is not required to state its reasons for denying the defendant's request for traffic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases