1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 5 F.3d
  5. 5 F.3d 439 (1993)
 

U.S. v. VAN DEN BERG

No. 92-10533.

5 F.3d 439 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pieter VAN DEN BERG, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 23, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Barton (argued), Susan J. Wolfe (on briefs), Nolan & Armstrong, Palo Alto, CA, for defendant-appellant.

Ross W. Nadel, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, District Judge.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Having entered a conditional plea of guilty to violating the Anti-Apartheid Act, Pieter van den Berg appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the prosecution on the ground of abatement. Because we conclude that the General Savings Statute applies to the Act, we affirm.

I. Facts and Proceedings

Over President Reagan's veto, Congress passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, codified at 22...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases