1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 7 F.3d
  5. 7 F.3d 422 (1993)
 

U.S. v. WATCH

No. 91-8671.

7 F.3d 422 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Lanier WATCH, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 5, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Pinckney, San Antonio, TX (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Richard L. Durbin, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Ronald F. Ederer, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, TX, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before JONES, DeMOSS, Circuit Judges, and BARBOUR, District Judge.

BARBOUR, District Judge:

Defendant, Gary Watch, appeals his conviction on the ground that the district court violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in accepting his guilty plea. Watch also appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence and seeks a determination that he has been denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We agree with Watch's Rule 11 argument, and therefore vacate his conviction so that he may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases