1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 262 N.J.
  5. 262 N.J. Super. 162 (1993)
 

BOARDWALK REGENCY CORP. v. BURD

262 N.J. Super. 162 (1993)

620 A.2d 448

BOARDWALK REGENCY CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JEFFREY SCOTT BURD AND LOUVETTE M. BURD, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 16, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell S. Berman argued the cause for appellants (Eisenstat, Gabage & Berman, attorneys; Mr. Berman on the brief).

Lloyd D. Levenson argued the cause for respondent (Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys; Mr. Levenson on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BRODY and THOMAS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by THOMAS, J.A.D.

Defendants appeal from a bench trial judgment setting aside the transfer of title to a single family home. The decision of the trial court was based upon the finding that the transfer was statutorily fraudulent, contrary to N.J.S.A. 25:2-27a. We agree with Judge Himmelberger's decision and affirm.

Defendant Jeffrey Burd suffered gambling losses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases