1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 267 N.J.
  5. 267 N.J. Super. 152 (1993)
 

BERRIE v. TOYOTA

267 N.J. Super. 152 (1993)

630 A.2d 1180

ALEXANDRA P. BERRIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Mensel argued the cause for appellant (Hanlon, Lavigne, Herzfeld & Rubin, attorneys; Lawrence N. Lavigne, of counsel; Mr. Mensel, on the brief).

Geoffrey D. Eberle argued the cause for respondent Alexandra P. Berrie (Gary D. Grant, attorney; Mr. Grant and Mr. Eberle, on the brief).

Alan C. Stephens, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Division of Consumer Affairs (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephens, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY and HUMPHREYS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURRELL IVES HUMPHREYS, A.J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs found after a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge that a 1991 Toyota Corolla was a "lemon". See N.J.S.A. 56:12-29 to -49. (the so called "Lemon Law" statute).

Toyota appeals contending that the wrong standard was applied and that the decision was "logically incoherent" and "contrary to the weight of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases